Abstract

AbstractFlood forecasting is a core of flood forecasting and flood warning system which can be implemented by both conceptual rainfall–runoff (CRR) model and black-box rainfall–runoff (BBRR) model. Dynamic artificial neural network (DANN) as an innovative BBRR model and HEC-HMS as a traditional CRR model were used for flood forecasting. The aim of this paper is to compare the efficiency of HEC-HMS and DANN for the determination of flood warning lead-time (FWLT) in a steep urbanized watershed. A framework is proposed to compare the performance of the models based on four criteria: type and quantity of required input data by each model, flood simulation performance, FWLT and expected lead-time (ELT). Finally, the results show that FWLT and ELT were estimated longer by DANN than by HEC-HMS model. In brief, because of less required data by BBRR model and its longer ELT, future research should be focused on better verification of it.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.