Abstract

Municipal solid waste constitutes one of the major challenges and concerns of our society. Disposal of waste material is potentially dangerous, harming both environment and mankind. In order to diminish negative effects of municipal solid waste, its thermal decomposition to valuable chemicals has been studied. The principal draw-back of thermal processes used for solid waste utilization as raw material is tar formation. In this study, low-cost catalysts of different origin were tested in the decomposition of a model component of tar originating from waste material pyrolysis/gasification. p-Xylene was selected as the model compound found in biomass decomposition products. Its decomposition was carried out in the presence of either tire pyrolysis char- or clay minerals-based catalysts. Tar-cracking activities of both catalyst types at varying experimental conditions were compared and related to the catalysts physical-chemical properties. In experiments, either empty reactor or reactor filled with 10 g of the catalyst was used; p-xylene mass flow was set to 2.58 g h−1 (50 μL min−1, room temperature), and decomposition temperature ranging from 750 °C to 850 °C was applied. Moreover, evolution of the output variables, p-xylene conversion and hydrogen content in the gas phase, with the reaction time was investigated. Catalysts’ properties were assessed based on nitrogen adsorption isotherms, thermogravimetric and elemental composition analyses. Amounts and composition of p-xylene catalytic decomposition products were evaluated using GC analysis of both gaseous phase and condensable products. Results showed the superiority of tire pyrolysis char catalyst over that based on clay minerals.

Highlights

  • Municipal solid waste (MSW) production has become an important issue recently

  • Results showed the superiority of tire pyrolysis char catalyst over that based on clay minerals

  • Metals content in the pyrolysis char catalyst can be found in our previous study [17]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Municipal solid waste (MSW) production has become an important issue recently. The World Bank, up to 2.01 billion tons of MSW were generated worldwide in 2016, which corresponds to 0.74 kg of waste per person and per day [1]. Projection of its production rate yields 3.40 billion tons of MSW in 2050. Disposal of waste material in landfills and dumps is dangerous, threatening the environment and humanity itself; still, these are the most frequently used strategies of MSW treatment. About 37% of waste is landfilled and 33% of it is disposed of via open dumping [1]. MSW has to be considered as a valuable product and, at the same time, valuable source of energy and raw materials

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.