Abstract

The CLC (Combined Location Classification) error model provides indices for overall data uncertainty in thematic spatio-temporal datasets. It accounts for the two major sources of error in such datasets, location error and classification error. The model assumes independence between error components, while recent studies revealed various degrees of correlation between error components in actual datasets. The goal of this study is to determine if the likely violation of model assumptions biases model predictions. A comprehensive algorithm was devised to simulate the entire process of error formation and propagation. Time series thematic maps were constructed, and modified maps were derived as realizations of underlying error patterns. Error rate and pattern (positive autocorrelation) were controlled for location error and for classification error. The magnitude of correlation between errors from different sources and correlation between error at different time steps was also controlled. A very good agreement between model predictions and simulation results was found in the absence of correlation in error between time steps and between error types, while the inclusion of such correlations was shown to affect model fit slightly. Given our current knowledge of spatio-temporal error patterns in real data, the CLC error model can be used reliably to assess the overall uncertainty in thematic change detection analyses.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.