Performance of a New Binocular Wavefront Aberrometer Based on a Self-imaging Diffractive Sensor

Abstract

To compare the performance of the Ophthonix Z-View diffractive aberrometer with two different Hartmann-Shack aberrometers. The Ophthonix Z-View was compared with the Alcon LADARWave and VISX WaveScan using 4 model eyes and 68 human eyes. Comparisons using three fixed, single-surface model eyes each with a different wavefront pattern were used to determine higher order accuracy. Lower order accuracy, linearity, and higher order repeatability were tested with a fourth model eye with a movable retinal surface. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent and the calculated spherical equivalent refraction of the aberrometers were compared in 68 human eyes. The Z-View was more accurate with lower noise compared to the WaveScan and LADARWave systems for higher order measurements of the fixed model eyes. Total root-mean-square difference from surface topography derived average values for all model eye configurations were 0.48, 0.95, and 0.74 microm for the Z-View, WaveScan, and LADARWave aberrometers, respectively. Average inter-measurement standard deviations for the fixed model eyes were 0.024, 0.025, and 0.034 microm for the Z-View, WaveScan, and LADARWave aberrometers, respectively. Results were similar among the systems for measuring the movable retina surface model eye and comparing manifest refraction spherical equivalent of the patients. Data gathered using one variable and several fixed-parameter model eyes showed good correlation to predicted values for all of the aberrrometers with one exception. A significant difference was found in the measurement of one individual fixed model eye with one of the three aberrometers. The wavefront refraction provided by the Z-View correlated well with the results of manifest refraction.