Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare a large-area, direct-readout, flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system, a storage-phosphor system, and a mammography screen-film system with regard to the detection of artificial bone erosions simulating rheumatoid disease, and to assess its diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose. Six hundred forty regions were defined in 160 metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint specimens from 20 monkey paws (4 regions per joint). Artificial bone erosions were created in 320 of these 640 regions. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to obtain absorption and scatter radiation conditions similar to those of a human hand. Imaging was performed using a flat-panel system, a speed class 200 screen-film system, a mammography screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system under exactly matched conditions. Different exposure doses equivalent to speed classes of S=100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-level confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for a total of 21,120 observations (1920 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated by the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. The ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.809 (S=200), 0.768 (S=400), 0.737 (S=800), 0.710 (S=1600), and 0.685 (S=3200) for the flat-panel system, 0.770 for the speed class 200 screen-film system, 0.781 (S=200), 0.739 (S=400), 0.724 (S=800), 0.680 (S=1600) for the storage-phosphor system, and 0.798 for the mammography screen-film system. Analysis of variance showed significant differences between different combinations of imaging modalities and exposure doses ( p<0.05). The diagnostic performance of the flat-panel detector system is superior to that of a screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system for the detection of erosive lesions at clinical exposure settings (S=200). Using the flat-panel system the exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain a diagnostic performance comparable to a speed class 200 screen-film system.