Performance Indicators of Basic Infrastructure of Kotaku Program (The City without Slums)

Awliya Tribhuwana,Ohan Farhan

doi:10.15294/jtsp.v22i2.24011

Abstract

Abstract. Wotgali Village is a slum area. The aim of the current research is to find out the performance of slum base infrastructure using Lakip (Government Agency Accountability Report) of KOTAKU (City without Slums) Program. The first step was performed by identifying the initial settlement (base line), then some treatments on the facilities and infrastructure (finish line), performance evaluation stages of the preparation, planning, implementation, and sustainability stages. The research used qualitative and quantitative approach. Qualitative measurement began with a numerical assessment of the results on the level of regional slum. In addition, quantitative data used the Lakip simulation using results of the KOTAKU program stage performance. Results of the initial condition reach value of 32%. It is categorized as slight slums with an average sectoral slum of 36.68%. Basic infrastructure development which has final technical reached 24% and is included in slight slum with an average sectoral of 27.50%. The performance of LAKIP Kotaku was in preparation phase 90.46% (very good performance), planning stage was 89.93% (very good performance), implementation stage was 90.25% (very good performance), sustainability stage was 85.21% (better performance). Thus, the achievement of KOTAKU program is 85.19% with a range of value of 80-90. The value is included as better performance result. Results of the analysis can be concluded that level of slum can be reduced to 19% (not slum) by creating some improvements to basic facilities and infrastructure. In the following year, involving Lakip Performance, the planning stage can be enhanced through community participation and active involvement.

Highlights

The development of an area that is less integrated and planned causes incomplete basic infrastructure and facilities
If an area has 5 out of 7 slum indicators the area is categorized as a slum area. [5] states that seven slum indicators include building conditions without arrangement, density levels and far beyond technical standards, environmental road conditions with inadequate service and quality of the environmental roads, drainage and the absence of puddle, adequate and or appropriate facilities and infrastructure, connectedness of drainage in the city system and drainage construction quality, waste water treatment, waste treatment system and fire protection [4]
At RT 1, initial identification with an assessment of 7 aspects of slums with 19 slums criteria earning an initial of sectoral slum of 36.44% with a 31 initial value of slum score, after a poverty-free city program is completed last identified of the slum area and get final average of sectoral slum of 23.70% with a 20 final value of slum level

Summary

Introduction

The development of an area that is less integrated and planned causes incomplete basic infrastructure and facilities. It leads to the emergence of housing and settlements with poor quality and not suitable for residential. The emergence of slums is caused by the unsuitable conditions These unsuitable conditions which are not suitable for residential consist of population and buildings that are too dense and less supported by the quality of facilities and infrastructure as technical requirements for living area [1]. If an area has 5 out of 7 slum indicators the area is categorized as a slum area. [5] states that seven slum indicators include building conditions without arrangement, density levels and far beyond technical standards, environmental road conditions with inadequate service and quality of the environmental roads, drainage and the absence of puddle, adequate and or appropriate facilities and infrastructure, connectedness of drainage in the city system and drainage construction quality, waste water treatment, waste treatment system and fire protection [4]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion