Abstract
Our research explores the joint effects of performance feedback and CEO overconfidence on firm risk taking. Drawing on the Behavioral Theory of the Firm and prior work on executive psychology we suggest that CEOs’ idiosyncratic levels of confidence will strongly shape their interpretation of their firms’ financial performance relative to social and historical aspiration levels and thus their willingness to make risky investment decisions. In particular, we posit that compared to less confident CEOs, the relationship between risk taking and both positive and negative performance feedback will be more positive for overconfident CEOs. Our results from a sample of 842 manufacturing firms provide support for our hypotheses and reveal that while non-overconfident CEOs react with a decrease in risk taking to both positive and negative feedback, in both cases overconfident CEOs decrease their risk taking much less and might instead even increase firm risk. Moreover, we find that threat of bankruptcy constitutes an important boundary condition for the moderating effect of CEO overconfidence on the link between negative performance feedback and risk taking.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.