Performance evaluation of WMA plant and field trial mixes

Abstract

Warm mix asphalt (WMA) technology is still in its infancy, with significant scope for further exploration of the benefits of incorporation of higher percentages of recycled asphalt RA as well as modified binders for performance enhancement. The objective of this study was to evaluate three different WMA technologies, namely chemical and organic additives as well as foamed technology, within different mix compositions. The variables in mix composition included 10–20 % RA in surfacing mixes and 20–40 % RA in base layer mixes. The binder variables included two base binders, control mixes (no modifier) and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) or styrene butadiene styrene (SBS) with or without WMA technologies. A partial factorial experimental design based on the above variables was developed. Full-scale plant mixes and field (construction) mixes were produced and beams were prepared from compacted slabs and tested under 4 point loading to provide master curves and fatigue relations. Comparative results show inconsistent trends between different technologies. control mixes (HMA) can provide both higher and lower flexural stiffness than their WMA counterparts. EVA or SBS modification can provide either superior or inferior mixes to their WMA counterparts depending on the WMA technology. Generally the fatigue results of both the HMA surfacing and base layer mixes at both RA contents are superior to their equivalent WMA counterparts. The implications of these differences are explored in the publication.