Abstract

Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) is the most severe environmental problem facing the mining sector in the current scenario because of low pH and high pollutants concentration. AMD contains a high amount of sulphate viz. pyrite, FeS2, and to a lesser extent pyrrhotite and heavy metal ions, contaminate both surface water and groundwater. To treat AMD, extensive research projects have been initiated by governments, the mining industry, universities, and research establishments. The environmental impact of AMD can be minimized at these basic levels; prevention should be taken to control the infiltration of groundwater to the pollution site and control the acid-generating process. There are some conventional active methods to treat AMD, such as compost reactor and packed bed iron-oxidation bioreactors; however, these methods have associated with costly material and high maintenance cost, which increases the cost of the entire treatment. In an alternative, the use of low-cost materials such as fly ash, metallurgical slag, zero-valent iron (ZVI), cement kiln dust (CKD), and organic waste such as peat humic agent (PHA), rice husk, and eggshell can be a valuable measure for economic viability to treat the metal-rich wastewater.

Highlights

  • The extensive mining throughout the globe leads to generate a huge quantity of sulfides caused by weathering process (O2, moisture, and microbes), which promotes an acidic environment

  • For a better characterization of AMD as well as the properties of waste which are affected by AMD is summarized into five common features listed as follows [3]

  • Arsenate does not form in such a higher concentration as that of sulphate but this metal has a different area of concern due to its toxic nature [7]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The extensive mining throughout the globe leads to generate a huge quantity of sulfides caused by weathering process (O2, moisture, and microbes), which promotes an acidic environment. In-stream water, it turns out to be a transport media for reaction products [1] The use of CaCO3 is more than other neutralizing material due to its cost-effectiveness It produces less amount of sludge but the reaction period is comparably high than other chemical reagents. Some other industrial outcomes like fly ash, steel slag, cement kiln dust, and bayer residue have possible calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide alternatives to treat AMD. The availability of these materials is generally high, which offers costeffective neutralizing materials for the treatment process

Characteristics of AMD wastewater
Acidity/alkalinity property
Concentration of different heavy metals
Iron and aluminum concentration
Sulphate and arsenate concentration
Turbidity and suspended solids
Occurrence of acid mine drainage
Environmental impact of acid mine drainage
Treatment technology for AMD
Natural zeolites
Passive technologies for the treatment of AMD
Treatment using various waste materials
Fly ash
Biomass ashes
Cement kiln dust slurry
BOF and SAF slags
Eggshell waste
Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call