Abstract

Various Supervised learning algorithms or techniques viz. Random Forest, Naïve Bayes Classifier, LogisticRegression (LR), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) algorithm, Support Vector Machines (SVM), etc are used for thepurpose of data classification.. But the question is which of the classification technique accurately identifies thissensitive disorders like Diabetes. The accuracy, specificity and sensitivity, are some of the important performanceevaluation parameters, which are required to be analysed for every machine learning algorithm. In the performedwork, the various classification techniques viz. (NB) Naïve Bayes Classifier, (LR) Logistic Regression, (KNN)K-Nearest Neighbour algorithm, (SVM) Support Vector Machines, and (RF) Random Forest are compared onthe basis of the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity as the performance evaluation parameters. The classifierswere exposed to the Pima Indian dataset for classification of diabetes, and their respective performance metricsAccuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity were compared. It is found that on account of accuracy sensitivity andspecificity the Random Forest performed the best on the Pima Indian Dataset for the Diabetes detection.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.