Performance evaluation of the Bilate and Furfuro irrigation schemes in Silti Zone, southern Ethiopia

Abstract

Many irrigation schemes are performing poorly for a number of reasons, and this should be improved to increase the efficiency and productivity of the schemes. This study attempted to determine the performance of the Bilate and Furfuro irrigation schemes in Silti Zone, southern Ethiopia. For field data measurements, three farmers’ fields were selected at the head, middle, and tail end of each scheme. Average conveyance efficiencies were 53% and 56.1%, average field application efficiencies were 55.9% and 58.0%, average water storage efficiencies were 53% and 46.5%, irrigation uniformity was 91.03% and 92.9%, and overall irrigation efficiency was 28% and 32% for Bilate and Furfuro schemes respectively. This implied that the two schemes were performing inefficiently and inadequately, but water was distributed uniformly. The reason might be most canal sections had unreasonable losses of water in two schemes. Additionally, relative water supply was 0.68 and 0.79, relative irrigation supply was 0.61 and 0.77, output per unit irrigated area was 4140.4 and 1781.5 ($/ha), output per unit command area was 4510.3 and 1968.5 ($/ha), output per unit irrigation supply was 0.94 and 0.28 ($/m3), output per unit water consumed was 0.99 and 0.39 ($/m3), sustainability of irrigation area was 1.05 and 1.02, and irritation ratio was 1.11 and 1.09 for Bilate and Furfuro schemes respectively. This revealed that the applied water was not satisfied the crop water demand, but their irrigated lands were expanded for two irrigation schemes. Furfuro scheme was better than Bilate in terms of relative water supply and relative irrigation supply, but their results obtained were below acceptable values. However, Bilate scheme had significantly better land and water productivity than Furfuro scheme. This may be use high value crops, better agricultural inputs, and removal of grass cover and sedimentation from canal systems. Hence, Bilate irrigation scheme was better performing than Furfuro scheme. Therefore, adopt the best practices learned from Bilate irrigation scheme for the Furfuro scheme.