Abstract
Performing accurate building energy prediction (BEP) is one of the most important foundations for achieving energy resource allocation and developing energy efficiency measures. Buildings are diverse and operate under complex conditions leading to distribution differences of energy-related data among different buildings. Owing to such differences, the already reported data-driven BEP models exhibit poor cross-building prediction performance since they only use insufficient operation data of a single building. Although several deep transfer learning (DTL) strategies have been applied with improved cross-building prediction performance, there is still a lack of comparison of various DTL strategies, which would help to determine the optimal DTL strategy for different scenarios. Hence, three DTL strategies were compared: network-based Fine-tune, adversarial-based domain adversarial neural network (DANN), and mapping-based domain adaptive neural network (DaNN). The usefulness of the DTL strategy was validated using the open source dataset Building Data Genome Project 2 in the scenario of insufficient available data for real buildings. The influences of several factors were analysed, such as the available data volumes of the source and target domains within the training set. The applicability of different DTL strategies was discussed considering both accuracy and computational cost. Results show that the three DTL strategies outperform the traditional long short-term memory (LSTM) with an average BEP performance improvement ratio (PIR) of 0.75. For the extremely limited amount of available training data scenario, Fine-tune was recommended for the next-few-weeks prediction owing to its good balance between time cost and prediction performance. For the data shortage scenario of BEP tasks for nearly a year, DANN was recommended owing to its outperforming prediction accuracy. This provides insights for practical applications of DTL during the development of BEP models for cross-building BEP tasks without sufficient operation data.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.