Abstract

<p>Video Streaming is a method to deliver multimedia content that allow files to be used or watched directly without the need to download and save it. Video streaming also include image processing, in image processing there is a component to compare the value of an image, that is PSNR. This research will compare the reactive and proactive routing protocol performance of AOMDV and DSDV using PSNR, Packetloss, and Throughput parameters in Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) for video streaming. The simulation uses 4, 16, 36, 64, and 100 nodes. The results of this research is AOMDV routing protocol with the greater variation in the number of nodes and the distance between nodes resulting in higher packet loss, decreasing throughput and decreasing values of PSNR. While in DSDV routing protocol with the greater variation in the number of nodes and distance between nodes has an impact on the increase of packetloss value, a very drastic decrease throughput value compared with the AOMDV routing protocol, a decrease in PSNR value and in some scenarios does not produce PSNR values. The comparison of PSNR values between the two routing protocols are also influenced by variations in the number of nodes and distances between nodes along with packetloss and throughput parameters. The greater packetloss will decrease the PSNR value generated.</p>

Highlights

  • Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are composed of a great huge number of nodes, which has significant research value and already successful applied in various fields, such as environmental monitoring, military applications, and target tracking etc (Han et al, 2020)

  • Output Evaluation, The output will be used as the performance criteria of AOMDV and DSDV routing protocol on variations in the number of nodes and distance between nodes consisting of packet loss, throughput, and PSNR

  • The results of AOMDV routing protocol were obtained, the greater variation in the number of nodes and the distance between nodes has an impact on the higher value of packet loss, the decrease in throughput value, and the value of PSNR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are composed of a great huge number of nodes, which has significant research value and already successful applied in various fields, such as environmental monitoring, military applications, and target tracking etc Wireless Mesh Network (WMN) is a type of wireless broadband access technology based on the IP protocol. To generate the value of PSNR, there are 2 types of routing protocols are used, reactive, and proactive. In previous research conducted by Sabrina Nefti and Maamar Sedrati in 2016 entitled "PSNR and Jitter Analysis of Routing Protocols for MANET Networks Video Streaming in Sparse, using NS2 and the Evalvid Framework" carried out the combined effects of sparse and density on the PSNR and jitter performance of two MANET routing protocols, namely AODV (reactive) and DSDV (proactive) for video streaming applications. This study will compare the reactive and proactive routing protocol performance of AOMDV and DSDV using the PSNR, Packet loss, and Throughput parameters in the Wireless Mesh Network (WMN). This research will be compiled as a thesis with the title "Evaluation of the Performance of AOMDV and DSDV Routing Protocols with Streaming Video on the Wireless Mesh Network”

Related Works
Research Method
Result
Conclusion
Authors
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call