Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluates four satellite-based precipitation datasets with gauged rainfall observations at a daily and wet season time scales. Satellite Precipitation Estimators from Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation Stations (CHIRPSv2), the Climate prediction center (CPC) morphing technique (CMORPH), the Integrated Multi-satellite Retrieval for GPM (IMERG-06) and Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks Cloud Classification System (PERSSIANN-CCS) were used. Categorical and continuous statistical techniques were applied to evaluate the detection and estimation ability of SPEs. Among the SPEs, CMORPH was superior, 0.90 and followed by IMERG-06, 0.82 in the Probability of detection (POD), Critical success index (CSI), 0.74 and 0.70 and Accuracy, 0.75 and 0.72 at wet season, respectively. The result of bias ratio showed underestimation for all SPEs at wet season and daily time scale. The comparison of SPEs in terms of RMSE indicated that IMERG-06 was better, 75.9 followed by CMORPH, 86.0. In terms of Relative bias (RBias), IMERG-06 was the second next to CHIRPSv2. On the other hand, IMERG-06 had better RMSE at JJAS and daily time scale. Overall, the findings of this evaluation study showed the capacity of IMERG-06 product could be reliable rainfall data sources for climate and hydrological analysis of central highlands of Abbay Basin.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.