Abstract
In this paper, we compare the performances of the least mean square (LMS) and constant modulus (CM) algorithms for beamforming. Our interest in these algorithms finds its origins in their reliability as a source-receiver pair. In addition, their use brings a great frequency of diversity even to respond quickly to the increasing spectral demand. The results suggest that the greater the number of elements in the antenna, the better the directivity for both LMS and CM. We also note that a judicious choice of the control parameter mu leads to a better speed of convergence for the two algorithms. Let us note, however, that LMS is more efficient. Our simulations show that in an environment affected by white Gaussian noise, LMS is more robust than CM. This confirms the theoretical result due to the fact that LMS uses a sequence for learning. Performance analyses of the two techniques are simulated in the MATLAB environment.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
