Abstract
We compare the performance of sixteen variants of the Kernelised Correlation Filter (KCF) tracker using the dataset and metrics introduced through the Visual Object Tracking (VOT) Challenge. An introduction to the KCF tracking framework is given, along with brief discussion on recent variants of the KCF tracker. Their performance is compared using the metrics of speed, accuracy, robustness and expected average overlap.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
