Performance enhancement of porous clay cooler for BIPV applications using hollowed clay structures and metallic extended fins as evaporation and thermal conductivity enhancers

Abstract

This paper investigates the employing of a passive evaporative cooling approach to mitigate the temperature rise of PV panels within building-integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems. The investigation explores enhancing the heat transfer capabilities of composite clay layers by incorporating thermal conductive materials such as iron-oxide and zinc-oxide. This enhancement aimed to improve the overall thermal properties of the composite clay structures, thereby boosting heat transfer rates. Additionally, two distinct designs were evaluated as well: one integrating hollowed clay layer and the other featuring a clay layer with extended fins to enhance both heat and mass transfer rates within the evaporative porous clay structure. A series of experiments conducted under real conditions using prototyped building rooms to simulate real BIPV systems to assess the cooling performance of the presented scenarios. The results revealed that the hollowed clay layer achieved the most substantial decrease in PV panel temperature, with a reduction of 16.5 % compared to the findings with a solid clay layer. In contrast, the composite Iron-oxide/clay layer demonstrated the smallest decrease in PV temperature at 11 %. Moreover, utilizing the hollowed clay structure led to a 6.3 % increase in average PV output power, as well as around 4.5 % enhancement in average photovoltaic’s efficiency compared to the outcomes observed with the solid clay layer. Moreover, incorporating the hollowed clay layer resulted in the most significant decrease in the building's annual load, achieving a reduction of 79.6 %. This signifies approximately a 2 % higher enhancement in cooling capabilities compared to utilizing solid clay layer. Further, the cost of electricity production decreased by 7.7 % (from 0.104 $/kWh to 0.096 $/kWh) following the incorporation of the hollowed clay layer, while the payback time was reduced by roughly 0.8 years compared to utilizing the solid clay layer and by 1.7 years in comparison to the non-cooled BIPV system.