Abstract

This work compares the performance of vertical subsurface flow treatment wetlands (VSSF TWs) for wastewater treatment, planted with Zantedeschia aethiopica (Za), here operated simultaneously under two different climate conditions, arid and Mediterranean. The experimental setup was divided into two treatment lines for each climate condition: three VSSF TWs planted with Schoenplectus californicus (Sc) (VSSF-S), as the control, and three VSSF TWs planted with Zantedeschia aethiopica (Za) (VSSF-Z), as the experimental unit. The four treatment systems were operated at a hydraulic loading rate of 120 mm/d during spring and summer seasons, in two locations, Iquique (Atacama Desert, Chile) and Talca (Central Valley, Chile). The water quality in effluents, plant development, and water balance were used as performance measures. In terms of the water quality, the influents’ characteristics were similar in both climates and classified as “diluted”. For the effluents, in both climate conditions, average COD and TSS effluent concentrations were below 50 mg/L and 15 mg/L, respectively. In both climate conditions, average TN and TP effluent concentrations were below 40 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively. Furthermore, only total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) in effluents to VSSF-Z had a significant effect (p < 0.05) in relation to the climate condition. Regarding plant development, Za showed a lower height growth in both climate conditions, with arid consistently 0.3 m and Mediterranean decreasing from 0.6 m to 0.2 m. However, the physiological conditions of the leaves (measured by chlorophyll content) were not affected during operation time in both climates. Water balance showed that it was not influenced by the climate conditions or plant, with water loss differences below 5%. Therefore, taking into account the water quality and water balance results, Zantedeschia aethiopica can be used in VSSF TWs in a way similar to traditional plants under arid and Mediterranean climates. However, its use has to be carefully considered because lower height could affect the esthetics for its implementation in the VSSF TWs.

Highlights

  • Treatment wetlands (TWs) are considered reliable wastewater treatment technology [1,2]

  • The similarity between the mean values for temperature in arid and Mediterranean climate conditions indicates that temperature should not have an effect on the process removal of organic matter and nutrients, especially nitrogen, because the temperature is above 15 ◦ C, which is an appropriate temperature for nitrification to take place in TWs [25]

  • These results were expected because the experiment took place during the austral spring and summer seasons; this coincides with previous results reported during this operation time in Mediterranean climate conditions [25,42]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Treatment wetlands (TWs) are considered reliable wastewater treatment technology [1,2]. VSSF TWs have more design and operational options (surface area, bed depth, filter medium, feeding mode, plant species [10]) compared with HSSF; its adaptability to operational conditions makes VSSF more suitable as a sustainable sanitation system. The implementation of VSSF TWs and their adaptation to new climate conditions (arid, tropical, Mediterranean, boreal) must be assessed, and efforts are underway to better understand the pollutant removal performance, plant selection, and innovative operational schemes [1,15,16,17]. Up to now, no performance comparative studies between VSSF TWs of systems operating in two very different climates, such as arid and Mediterranean, or reporting on the use of ornamental flowers have been published

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call