Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between two different 6R articulated robot architectures, one with a spherical wrist and the other with a non-spherical wrist and three consecutive parallel axes, which are found mainly in collaborative arms. The performance of the two architectures has been evaluated in terms of linear and rotational velocity using the Kinematic Directional Index (KDI). The results highlight the relation between the robot’s velocity along a direction and the joint velocities. In this way, the proposed approach allows the evaluation of the best performance in a direction and the joints that limit the considered motion.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call