Performance comparison: exome sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger sequencing.

Abstract

Next generation sequencing tests are used routinely as first-choice tests in the clinic. However, systematic performance comparing the results of exome sequencing as a single test replacing Sanger sequencing of targeted gene(s) is still lacking. Performance comparison data are critically important for clinical case management. In this study, we compared Sanger-sequencing results of 258 genes to those obtained from next generation sequencing (NGS) using two exome-sequencing enrichment kits: Agilent-SureSelectQXT and Illumina-Nextera. Sequencing was performed on leukocytes and buccal-derived DNA from a single individual, and all 258 genes were sequenced a total of 11 times (using different sequencing methods and DNA sources). Sanger sequencing was completed for all exons, including flanking ± 8bp regions. For the 258 genes, NGS mean coverage was > 20 × for > 98 and > 91% of the regions targeted by SureSelect and Nextera, respectively. Overall, 449 variants were identified in at least one experiment, and 407/449 (90.6%) were detected by all. Of the 42 discordant variants, 23 were determined as true calls, summing-up to a truth set of 430 variants. Sensitivity of true-variant detection was 99% for Sanger sequencing and 97-100% for the NGS experiments. Mean false-positive rates were 3.7E-6 for Sanger sequencing, 2.5E-6 for SureSelect-NGS and 5.2E-6 for Nextera-NGS. Our findings suggest a high overall concordance between Sanger sequencing and NGS performances. Both methods demonstrated false-positive and false-negative calls. High clinical suspicion for a specific diagnosis should, therefore, override negative results of either Sanger sequencing or NGS.