Performance characteristics of Allele-Specific PCR (ASPCR) in detecting drug resistance mutations among non-B HIV-1 Variants

Abstract

Allele-Specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (ASPCR) is an affordable point-mutation assay whose validation could improve the detection of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in resource-limited settings (RLS). We assessed the performance of ASPCR onforty-four non-B HIV-1 plasma samples from patients who were ARV treated in failure in N’Djamena-Chad. Viral RNA was reverse-transcribed and amplified using LightCycler® FastStart DNA MasterPLUS SYBR Green I. Detection of six major DRMs (K70R, K103N, Y181C, M184V, T215F, T215Y) was evaluated on Roche LightCycler®480 automated system (with dilutions 0.01–100%). ASPCR-results were compared to Sanger-sequencing (gold-standard). Correlations of mutation curves were excellent (R2 >0.97); all DRMs were detected with desirable mutant/wild-type threshold differences (ΔCt≥9) except K70R(ΔCtK70R=6; ΔCtK103N=13; ΔCtM184V=9; ΔCtT215F=12; ΔCtT215Y=12; ΔCtY181C=9) and positive controls were below required thresholds. Also, ASPCR reproducibility on DRMs was assessed by using dilutions of intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variations respectively with a threshold of less than 50(i.e.<0.50 variation) which are;: K70R (0.02–0.28 vs. 0.12–0.37), K103N (0.08–0.42 vs. 0.12–0.37), Y181C (0.12–0.39 vs. 0.31–0.37), M184V (0.13–0.39 vs. 0.23–0.42), T215F (0.05–0.43 vs. 0.04–0.45) and T215Y (0.13–0.41 vs. 0.19–0.41). DRM detection-rate by ASPCR vs Sanger was respectively: M184V (63.6% vs. 38.6%); T215F (18.1% vs. 9.1%); T215Y (6.8% vs. 2.3%); K70R (4.5% vs. 2.3%). K103N (22.7% vs. 13.6%); Y181C (13.6% vs. 11.4%). Correlations of mutation curves were excellent (R2 >0.97); all DRMs were detected with desirable mutant/wild-type threshold differences (ΔCt≥9) except K70R(ΔCtK70R=6; ΔCtK103N=13; ΔCtM184V=9; ΔCtT215F=12; ΔCtT215Y=12; ΔCtY181C=9) and positive controls were below required thresholds. Also, ASPCR reproducibility on DRMs was assessed by using dilutions of intra-assay and inter-assay coefficient of variations respectively with a threshold of less than 50(i.e.<0.50 variation) which are;: K70R (0.02–0.28 vs. 0.12–0.37), K103N (0.08–0.42 vs. 0.12–0.37), Y181C (0.12–0.39 vs. 0.31–0.37), M184V (0.13–0.39 vs. 0.23–0.42), T215F (0.05–0.43 vs. 0.04–0.45) and T215Y (0.13–0.41 vs. 0.19–0.41). DRM detection-rate by ASPCR vs Sanger was respectively: M184V (63.6% vs. 38.6%); T215F (18.1% vs. 9.1%); T215Y (6.8% vs. 2.3%); K70R (4.5% vs. 2.3%). K103N (22.7% vs. 13.6%); Y181C (13.6% vs. 11.4%). ASPCR appears more efficient for detecting DRMs on diverse HIV-1 non-B circulating in RLS like Chad.