Abstract
Transit operating subsidy allocation procedures based on such factors as deficit or population have been under attack ever since operating subsidy became widespread in the 1970s. These procedures do not directly provide any incentive for innovation, cost cutting strategies, and efficient operation. Recognizing the problems associated with a 100 percent population-based formula, the State of Indiana, since 1986, has used transit performance as a part of its subsidy allocation procedure. This paper examines the impact of this procedure on transit system self-reliance, efficiency, and effectiveness by analyzing the relevant data between the periods before and after the procedure was instituted. The results show that the procedure has positively affected transit system performance, particularly for small- and medium-sized properties. The largest positive change has been realized in transit system effectiveness and self-reliance, while no perceptible change was observed in transit system efficiency.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
