Abstract

In Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) nodes often change their location independently where neither fixed nor centralized infrastructure is present. Nodes communicate with each other directly or via intermediate nodes. The advantages of the MANET layout lead to self-structure and compatibility to most important functions such as traffic distribution and load balancing. Whenever the host moves rapidly in the network the topology becomes updated due to which the structure of MANET varies accordingly. In the literature, different routing protocols have been studied and compared by researchers. Still, there are queries regarding the performance of these protocols under different scenarios. MANETs are not based on a predesigned structure. In this paper, the performance assessment of the Quality of Services (QoS) for different protocols such as Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) and Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP) in the existence of the various number of communicating nodes is studied. The performance matrices throughput, end – to – end delay and packet delivery ratio are considered for simulations. Ns 2.35 simulator is used for carrying out these simulations. Results are compared for AODV, TORA, and ZRP routing protocols. The results show that AODV and TORA perform well in end – to – end delay as compared to zone routing protocol. Zone routing protocol performs well in packet delivery ratio and throughput as compared to both the other protocols.

Highlights

  • Adhoc networks have become an attractive field for researchers in recent years

  • This study investigates the performance assessment of routing protocols i.e. Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA), and Zone Routing Protocol (ZRP)

  • AODV is superior for fair networks while ZRP performs well in terms of Packet delivery ratio but AODV is best in all conditions

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Adhoc networks have become an attractive field for researchers in recent years. Many options look to target on combining the traffic and networks and have guaranteed to create incredible outcomes [1]. MANET is used in different areas such as commercial sectors, military battlefields, and personal area networks [2]. MANET works on mobility with no fixed networks so multi-hop routing will be required. Static routing cannot support portable networks [3]. This study investigates the performance assessment of routing protocols i.e. AODV, TORA, and ZRP. The performance of TORA is superior for heavy networks. Performance Assessment of QoS Using AODV, TORA and ZRP Routing Protocol in MANET and AODV is superior for fair networks while ZRP performs well in terms of Packet delivery ratio but AODV is best in all conditions.

Challenges in MANET
Classification of Routing Protocols
RELATED WORK
Simulations Setup
Performance Metrics
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call