Performance assessment of pulsating floc blanket clarifiers and conventional clariflocculators in pilot‐scale models

Abstract

Continuous upflow pilot plants based on conventional clariflocculation (CC) and pulsating floc blanket clarification (PFBC) technologies were designed and fabricated for a capacity to treat about 8,000L/day, to understand the fundamental differences in their functioning and assess their relative performance, especially under low turbidity conditions. Influent turbidity varying from 2 to 10 NTU was treated using coagulant alum, and efficiency of CC and PFBC in terms of average turbidity removal was found to be 23% and 48%, respectively. On observing this vast difference, it was postulated that total residual aluminum should also be lower in water treated from PFBC. Experiments and MLR analysis confirmed the hypothesis, with residual aluminum ranging from 0.055 to 0.040mg/L and 0.036mg/L to below detectable levels for CC and PFBC, respectively. These findings are of high significance, since minimization of residual aluminum in drinking water is a priority of WHO due to its reported neurotoxicity and can be complied with simple replacement of CC with PFBC. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Pulsating floc blanket clarifier (PFBC) performed better than conventional clariflocculator (CC) in terms of turbidity removal. Pulsating floc blanket allowed more effective utilization of coagulant alum, resulting in significantly lower residual aluminum in clarified water. Turbidity levels of influent and effluent are related to residual aluminum in treated water. PFBCs are more compact and modular, and can facilitate a good alternative to CCs.