Abstract

With the advances and modernization of GPS, GLONASS, BDS, Galileo and QZSS, multi-frequency and multi-system joint positioning has become the mainstream positioning and navigation. Therefore, it is of great importance to perform a comprehensive assessment of the signal quality and positioning performance of multi-frequency and multi-GNSS. In this work, we used the multi-GNSS observation data collected by the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS), Hong Kong CORS, and GNSS Research Centre of Curtin University. Firstly, the quality of multi-frequency and multi-GNSS observation data is evaluated and analyzed. Then, the five-system triple-frequency ionospheric-free combined PPP (IF-PPP) and uncombined PPP (UC-PPP) models are established, and their performance in static PPP and kinematic PPP is evaluated. Finally, the performance of multi-frequency multi-GNSS in short baseline, medium long baseline and very long baseline is evaluated. Based on the results, three major observations are made as follows. (1) The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the five constellations (i.e. BDS, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS) are all above 30dB Hz and the multipath errors are within 1m, indicating good signal quality. (2) For static PPP, compared with IF-PPP model, the convergence time of triple-frequency UC-PPP model is reduced by 4.9%, 3.2%, and 13.8% for BDS-2+3, GPS, and GPS/GLONASS/BDS-2+3/Galileo/QZSS, respectively. However, the positioning accuracy of triple-frequency UC-PPP model is improved by 15.9%, 11.8%, and 10.9%, respectively, compared with IF-PPP model. For kinematic PPP, with the increased number of BDS-3 satellites, BDS has achieved better positioning results than GPS. (3) In terms of baseline solution performance, the accuracy of triple-frequency GPS/GLONASS/BDS/Galileo/QZSS combined baseline solution is about 60% higher than that of triple-frequency GPS-only baseline solution, showing a significant performance gain due to the use of multi-GNSS observations.

Highlights

  • With the establishment and development of Global Positioning System (GPS), GLONASS, BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and Galileo Navigation SatelliteThe associate editor coordinating the review of this manuscript and approving it for publication was Zheng H

  • Compared with ionospheric-free combined PPP (IF-PPP) model, the convergence time of triple-frequency uncombined PPP (UC-PPP) model is reduced by 4.9%, 3.2%, 3.7%, 5.0%, 10.0% and 13.8% for BDS2+3, GPS, GPS/BDS-2+3, GPS/GLONASS/BDS-2+3, GPS/GLONASS/BDS-2+3/Galileo and five-constellation schemes, respectively

  • Based on the multi-frequency and multi-GNSS observation data collected by International GNSS Service (IGS) Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX), HK CORS, GNSS Research Centre of Curtin University, the paper implemented a detailed and comprehensive assessment of the signal quality and positioning performance of multi-frequency multi-GNSS

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

With the establishment and development of Global Positioning System (GPS), GLONASS, BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and Galileo Navigation Satellite. We aim to assess the performance of signal quality, PPP and baseline solution with the integration of GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo, and QZSS multi-frequency observations, and the results may be used as reference for the future multi-frequency and multi-GNSS positioning. This paper implements a systematic and comprehensive assessment of signal quality and positioning performance of the individual constellations (GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo and QZSS) and their combined solutions. We use triple-frequency BDS-2+3/GPS/GLONASS/ Galileo/QZSS observations to enhance the performance of static PPP and kinematic PPP. Compared with the previous studies, we present a baseline solution scheme of triple-frequency BDS-2+3/GPS/GLONASS/Galileo/QZSS, and the solution shows considerable performance gain. Even if the baseline is very long (e.g. greater than 2000km), after 6 hours of observation, the 3D positioning accuracy of triple-frequency BDS2+3/GPS/GLONASS/Galileo/QZSS scheme is better than 5cm

COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF SIGNAL QUALITY
DISTRIBUTIONS OF VISIBLE SATELLITES AND PDOP
BASELINE SOLUTION PERFORMANCES
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call