Abstract
Abstract Water-alternating-gas (WAG) floods are designed to lessen the mobility of CO2 and thereby increase sweep efficiency. Common factors that often lead to less-than-ideal flood performance include reservoir heterogeneity triggering nonintuitive injector/producer connectivity, lack of conformance control, and injection at pressure greater than the fracture pressure, among others. Therefore, intensive reservoir monitoring and data interpretation should be the cornerstone of any prudent reservoir-management practice. This study uses a slate of analytical tools to monitor flood performance in miscible and immiscible WAG floods. These tools include the capacitance-resistance model (CRM) and several diagnostic plots, such as the reciprocal-productivity index (RPI), the water–oil ratio (WOR), EOR-efficiency-measure plot, and modified Hall plot (MH). This paper offers several alternative CRM solutions to account for unbalanced patterns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
