Abstract

Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations of planing hulls are generally considered less reliable than simulations of displacement hulls. This is due to the flow complexity around planing hulls, especially in the bow region, where the sprays are formed. The recent and constant increasing of computational capabilities allows simulating planing hull features, with more accurate turbulence models and advanced meshing procedures. However, mesh-based approaches based on the finite volume methods have shown to be limited in capturing all the phenomena around a planing hull. As such, the focus of this study is on evaluating the ability of the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics mesh-less method to numerically solve the 3-D flow around a planing hull and simulate more accurately the spray structures, which is a rather challenging task to be performed with mesh-based tools. A novel application of the DualSPHysics code for simulating a planing hull resistance test has been proposed and applied to the parent hull of the Naples warped planing hull Systematic Series. The drag and the running attitudes (heave and dynamic trim angle) are computed for a wide range of Froude’s numbers and discussed concerning experimental values.

Highlights

  • Planing hulls are high-speed crafts where the hydrodynamic forces are more predominant than the hydrostatic ones

  • Due to the granular nature of the Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamic (SPH) discretization, such test is necessary before executing numerical simulations to check any inconsistency with a real case

  • For a more comprehensive picture about the validity of the results here exposed, it is possible to refer to the results shown in De Luca et al, 2016 [18], where the Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Planing hulls are high-speed crafts where the hydrodynamic forces are more predominant than the hydrostatic ones. Various methods are available at hand to calculate the hydrodynamic characteristics of planing hulls such as experimental, analytical, and numerical. Experimental methods (ITTC HSMV Committee report, 1999 [1]) were the first developed but require expensive facilities and measurement tools to be conducted. Developed the analytical/empirical framework to evaluate the lift, drag, and dynamic trim angle based on a few input data (i.e., the hull dimensions, the deadrise angle, the longitudinal center of gravity, and the forward speed) to understand the basic hydrodynamic characteristics of the planing surface. Savitsky’s method and its developments still represent the most widespread method to evaluate the planing hull performance in the preliminary assessments of the design stage (Blount, 2014 [3])

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call