Abstract
The aim to evaluate whether different beak trimming methods affected the performance and well-being of laying hens raised in cage and floor systems. During the starter phase, we used a completely randomized design, with three treatments (hot blade beak trimming, infrared beak trimming, and no beak trimming (control)), with four repetitions and in the grower and production phase, we used a factorial arrangement scheme involving two production systems (cage or floor) and three beak management methods (as above). We reared the birds in starter, grower and production phases over a course of 30 weeks. We evaluated productivity, egg quality, behavioral parameters and biochemical variables. In the starter phase, control birds showed higher blood glucose levels (p=0.043). In the grower phase, birds subjected to hot blade beak trimming and control birds showed lower feed intake and better feed conversion. Triglyceride levels were higher in the cage rearing system (p<0.05). In the production phase, the cage rearing system showed higher productivity (p<0.05), mean egg weight (p<0.01), cholesterol levels (p<0.05) and oxygen reactive species levels (p<0.05). In the production phase, the floor system gave rise to a higher frequency of comfort movement behaviors (p<0.01). Hens in cage had improved their performance and had greater egg production efficiency. The choice of the beak method depends on the breeding system.
Highlights
In the internet age, information regarding animal production and management systems are universally available, coincident with increasing concern animal welfare
Bird performance during the starter phase not changes between treatments, differences between treatments were expected at this stage, because considerable stress is generated by beak trimming, especially by the hot blade treatment
Dennis and Cheng (2010) attributed differences in performance to chronic pain from wounds caused by the treatment, with consequent decreased feeding and poor body development
Summary
Information regarding animal production and management systems are universally available, coincident with increasing concern animal welfare. According to Gentle (2011), the pain resulting from the procedure can be acute or chronic, with variable durations, according to the beak trimming method as well as the age of the bird undergoing the procedure. Beak trimming resulted in lower feed wastage with a consequent improvement in feed conversion (Araujo et al, 2005) This may explain why the practice remains common in modern production systems. The conventional cage rearing system reduces the space per animal and does not provide environmental enrichment for the bird.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.