Abstract
In this paper we compare, by simulation based on real traffic traces, the EFCI (explicit forward congestion indication) and the ERF (explicit rate feedback) rate-based flow control algorithms for the available bit rate (ABR) service in ATM networks. The factors under consideration are: (1) distance from source to destination and (2) rate of resource management (RM) cells. Although no significant fairness throughput problem has been identified in both EFCI and ERF, sources with high end-to-end propagation delay will experience higher queueing delay and loss probability. In this paper, we have also shown that although EFCI can lead to considerably lower utilisation than ERF if the parameters are set arbitrarily, it can perform as good as or close to ERF if there were complementary software which can compute the optimal parameters for EFCI based on the on-line measurement of traffic streams.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.