Abstract

The sudden and harmful nature of rockbursts in tunnels necessitates an accurate and applicable method for automatically recognizing rock fracture signals during rockburst microseismic (MS) monitoring. In this paper, the performance and applicability of recognizing MS waveforms using an artificial neural network (ANN) and a deep neural network (DNN) were studied in tunnels excavated by different methods. The results show that ANN performs very well in recognizing rock fracturing waveforms with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) ≥ 3 but has a low accuracy for those with an SNR < 3. The DNN also performs well for waveforms with SNR ≥ 3, and has a relatively high accuracy for waveforms with SNR < 3. The ANN model can be used in tunnels excavated by drilling and blasting (D&B) since there are fewer “small” rock fracturing events. The DNN model is applicable in tunnels excavated by the tunnel boring machine (TBM), recognizing more “small” events. In addition, the ANN model is a better choice, with fewer training samples at the initial stage of monitoring working. With continuous monitoring, the DNN model can be used to ensure and improve the accuracy. These results lay a foundation for automatic rockburst MS monitoring techniques in tunnel engineering.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.