Abstract

Ultrawideband (UWB) is considered as a promising technology in indoor positioning due to its accurate time resolution and good penetration through objects. Since the functional model of UWB positioning is nonlinear, iterative algorithms are often considered for solving the nonlinear problem. With a rough initial value, we can obtain the optimal solution by the way of continuous iteration. As an iterative descent method of high efficiency, the Gauss–Newton method is widely used to estimate the position. However, in the UWB indoor positioning, since the location information of the user is rather limited, it is not easy to get a good initial value for iteration. Besides, the positioning system is prone to become ill-posed. These factors make the Gauss–Newton method not easy to converge to a global optimal solution or even diverge, especially under ill-conditioned positioning configuration. Furthermore, the linearization of the positioning functional model results in biased least-squares estimation. The Gauss–Newton method only includes the first-order Taylor expansion of distance equations. The bias comes from neglected higher order terms. In this study, the closed-form Newton method which considers the high order partial derivatives is introduced and proposed. The simulation and measurement experiments are implemented to analyze the performance of the closed-form Newton method in UWB positioning. Both the initial value factor and geometric configuration factor are discussed. Experimental results are given to demonstrate that the closed-form Newton method can converge to the global optimal solution with better convergence and higher efficiency regardless of whether the initial iteration value is reasonable or not. Meanwhile, the closed-form Newton method can improve the accuracy of positioning results, particularly when the anchors are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed, or the ranging error is relatively large. The study shows that closed-form of the Newton method has better convergence and positioning performance than the Gauss–Newton method, especially under ill-conditioned positioning configuration or relatively low measurement precision, even though it adds a little computational cost.

Highlights

  • During recent decades, with the development of global navigation satellite system (GNSS), people pay more and more attention to the location based on service [1]

  • The linearization of the positioning functional model results in biased least-squares estimators. e Gauss–Newton method only includes the first-order Taylor expansion of distance equations. e bias comes from neglected higher order terms, which can be regarded as a systematic error

  • The accuracy of horizontal location estimation results of the closed-form Newton method is effectively improved compared to the Gauss–Newton method. e reason is that the Gauss–Newton method only includes the first-order Taylor expansion of distance equations due to the linearization of the positioning functional model. e bias comes from neglected higher order terms, which can be regarded as a systematic error. e closed-form Newton method which considers the high order partial derivatives is more stable and effective

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the development of global navigation satellite system (GNSS), people pay more and more attention to the location based on service [1]. E traditional positioning algorithms solve the nonlinear distance equations by linearizing them, and the solution can be found iteratively [16]. E numerical characteristics of a number of iterative descent algorithms for solving nonlinear least-squares problem have been discussed, in the Gauss–Newton method [18]. A standard method for solving the nonlinear equations is Gauss–Newton iteration which is efficient and has a linear rate of convergence for points close to the solution [18]. To minimize the objective function for the optimal position estimation, the performance of Gauss–Newton type and the quasi-Newton methods is analyzed and discussed [28].

The Nonlinear Distance Equations for UWB Positioning
The Closed-Form Newton Method
Numerical Examples
Method
Methods
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call