Abstract

Time Series Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (TSInSAR) methods have been widely and successfully applied for spatiotemporal ground deformation monitoring. The main groups of methodological approaches are often referred to as Persistent Scatterer (PS), Small Baseline (SB), and hybrid approaches that incorporate PS and SB concepts. While TSInSAR techniques have long been able to provide accurate deformation rates for various applications, their corresponding performance in complex environments such as mining areas has to be investigated. This study focuses on comparing the performance of three open source TSInSAR toolboxes (Stamps, Giant, Mintpy) over an extended region that includes an active opencast coal mine. We present the deformation results of each TSInSAR method on a Sentinel-1 dataset of 125 acquisitions spanning around 2.5 years over the Ptolemaida-Florina coal mine site that is characterized by several environmental and surface deformation conditions. First, a cross-comparison analysis is presented over different land cover classes. The study shows that all TSInSAR methods are capable for generating similar ground deformation results when the area has stable ground scattering conditions and the dataset sufficient temporal sampling. The most controversial results between TSInSAR approaches were found in land cover classes that include medium to high vegetation. An external comparative analysis between the different results from TSInSAR methods and leveling measurements is also performed. Stamps approach presented the best agreement with the in-situ deformation rates. The Giant approach yielded the best cumulative deformation results due to our a priori knowledge of temporal behavior of deformation in the vicinity of the leveling locations. Finally, we discuss the main pros and cons of each TSInSAR approach and we highlight the importance of comparison analysis that can provide insights and can lead to better interpretation of the results.

Highlights

  • Introduction and MotivationGround movements and surface deformation on mines can lead to instabilities and slope failures that can cause risks to personnel, equipment, and production [1]

  • The temporal reference has been changed to the first available satellite acquisition after the inversion of each algorithm approach

  • Cross-Comparison of Time Series Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (TSInSAR) Results An Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) metric is calculated for each pairwise combination of the results provided by the methods (Figure 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ground movements and surface deformation on mines can lead to instabilities and slope failures that can cause risks to personnel, equipment, and production [1]. The main limitations in our ability to monitor deformation in mining regions are the difficult and fast changing conditions caused by the ongoing mining activity. In order to successfully monitor the complex spatial and temporal behavior of the deformation in mining regions, a monitoring system with suitable spatial density of measurement points (MPs) with a high measurement frequency is required. The monitoring techniques of such a system can be divided into two main categories. The first category is related to surveying techniques that determine the absolute and relative positions of certain points. The most popular surveying instruments that are commonly used are GNSS

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call