Abstract

Problem statement: Data generated in wireless sensor networks may not all be alike: some data may be more important than others and hence may have different delivery requirements, To solve this problem addressed a differentiated data delive ry in the presence of congestion in wireless sensor networks and proposed a class of algorithms that en force differentiated routing based on the congested areas of a network and data priority. Approach: The basic protocol, called Congestion-Reduction Routing (CRR), discovers the congested zone of the network that exists between high-priority data sources and the data sink and using simple forwardi ng rules, dedicates this portion of the network to forwarding primarily high-priority traffic. Since C RR requires some overhead for establishing the high-priority routing zone, it is unsuitable for hi ghly mobile data sources. To accommodate all these things defined MAC-Enhanced CRR (MCRR), which includes MAC-layer enhancements and a protocol for forming high-priority paths on the fly for each burst of data. MCRR effectively handles the mobility of high-priority data sources, at the expense of degrading the performance of low-priorit y traffic and presented an extensive simulation resul ts for CRR and MCRR and an implementation of MCRR on a 48-node testbed. Results: Proposed CRR and MCRR algorithms were implemented by using NS2 simulator and the QOS parameters on throughput, packet delivery ratio, delay and energy. All parameters were analyzed and compared with basic AODV mechanism. Conclusion/Recommendations: CRR is better suited for static networks with long -duration HP floods. For bursty HP traffic and/or mobile HP sour ces, MCRR is a better fit. Because of the lower delay, CRR and its variants appear suitable to real -time data delivery.

Highlights

  • With large deployment sizes, congestion becomes an important problem

  • We propose the use of data prioritization and a differentiated routing protocol and/or a prioritized medium access scheme to mitigate its effects on HP traffic

  • Though 802.11e is similar to MAC-Enhanced CRR (MCRR) in that they both prioritize access to the medium, the prioritized RTS/CTS messages in highly congested networks may be dropped. 802.11e’s policy of guarding every transmission with an RTS/CTS exchange leads to a prohibitive overhead

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Congestion becomes an important problem. Congestion may lead to indiscriminate dropping of data (i.e., High-Priority (HP) packets may be dropped while Low-Priority (LP) packets are delivered. Congestion becomes worse when a particular area is generating data at a high rate This may occur in deployments in which sensors in one area of interest are requested to gather and transmit data at a higher rate than In this case, routing dynamics can lead to congestion on specific paths. These paths are usually close to each other, which lead to an entire zone in the network facing congestion (Alfawaer et al, 2007; Hull et al, 2004; Sharieh et al, 2008). We strive for a solution that accommodates both LP and HP traffic when the network is static or near static and enables fast recovery of LP traffic in networks with mobile HP data sources

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call