Abstract

Due to their transparent rear side, bifacial modules can take advantage of rear side irradiance as opposed to monofacial modules. Glass or transparent backsheets are conventionally used as rear side encapsulation material. To increase coupling gains achieved through internal reflection at the module rear side, a white or reflecting mesh structure can be applied in the areas between the cells on the rear side material. In this study, an existing optical model based on a simplified ray tracing approach is extended to describe the effects achieved though this mesh structure. The model is further integrated into a complete cell-to-module loss and gain analysis. The performance of the mesh backsheet concept is assessed under varying parameters. The impact of mesh reflectance, bifaciality of the cell and width of the mesh compared to the cell spacing are investigated. Losses due to increased module temperature and gains due to internal reflection gains are compared. We confirm that the optimal power gain can be achieved when the width of the mesh is the same as the spacing between the cells. We find that the power gain due to the improved internal reflection outweighs the power loss due to increased module temperature.

Highlights

  • A bifacial photovoltsic (PV) module utilizes irradiance from both sides for the generation of electricity [1,2,3]

  • We analyze the performance of PV modules with mesh backsheets by CTM ratio and power gain

  • The power gain is determined for a variation of the effective backsheet reflectance, the cell bifaciality factor, the width of the mesh and the distance between cell and coated area on the module rear side xre f

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A bifacial photovoltsic (PV) module utilizes irradiance from both sides for the generation of electricity [1,2,3]. A transparent backsheet or glass in a bifacial module enables the utilization of the additional irradiance that can enter through the module rear side [4,5]. Previous studies have analyzed the performance of bifacial modules with internal reflection, including one position of the internal reflector and tilt angles. These studies did not consider rear side irradiance and the layout of the module rear side, such as the width, thickness and position of the coated area [9,10,11,12].

Overview
Cell-to-Module
RayGroup
Direct gains from the rear
Threshold
Illuminated
Reflection and Direct Gains from Rear Side Illumination
Shaded
Total Irradiance on Solar Cell
CTM Factor k11
Results
S1: Power Gain Depending on the Reflectance the Mesh Coating
S2: Power Gain Depending on the Bifaciality Factor of the Solar Cell
When the incident
S3: Power Gain Depending ongain the Width the Mesh Bars
S3: Power Gain
12. Illuminated
S4: Comparison
14. Performance module with transparent mesh considering backsheet considering
S5: Comparison of Mesh Backsheet with Uniform Backsheets
16. Performance of module bifacial with
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call