Abstract
Abstract: Using a privately available dataset from kaggle.com, this research compares the performance of six well-known machine-learning approaches for predicting heart failure. which include Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosted Trees (GBT), Naive Bayes, Random Forest (RF), and Tree Ensemble. Heart failure is a major public health problem and it is necessary to improve the treatment of heart disease patients to increase the rate of survival. Delicacy was used to assess the performance of machine learning methods. RF produced the highest performance score of 80% when compared to Decision Tree Classifier and Tree Ensemble, Gradient BoostedTrees (GBT), Naive Bayes, and Logistic Regressions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
