Abstract

In this paper, the numerical performances of the algorithm IDEAL proposed by the present authors in 2008, and the recently proposed (2017) SIMPLERR are systematically analyzed and compared via six incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems. It is found that the two algorithms are almost identical when the second inner iteration number of IDEAL is fixed at 2. In general, the robustness and convergence of IDEAL are much better than SIMPLERR. The reason why the performance of SIMPLERR deteriorates with the increase of the first inner iteration number is analyzed and detailed comparisons in the robustness and computing time are presented.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.