Abstract

Infragravity (IG) waves significantly affect the operational efficiency of ports. Therefore, an accurate prediction of IG waves inside a harbor is necessary. In this study, the accuracy of the wave-group-resolving model XBeach Surfbeat (XB-SB, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands) in predicting the IG waves inside a harbor was assessed by comparing its results with field measurements. Field measurements were performed at Hambantota Port in southern Sri Lanka. Three acoustic waves and current sensors were used to observe the wave characteristics inside and outside the harbor. First, the model was validated against observations outside the port. Next, the performance accuracy of XB-SB in modeling the hydrodynamics in the harbor was evaluated by comparing its results with the values measured inside the port. The results of the numerical simulations indicated that both the nearshore short and IG wave heights can be accurately reproduced by XB-SB in an open domain without many obstacles. However, the short wave heights in the harbor are severely underestimated by XB-SB. The IG waves inside the harbor are overestimated most of the time. Moreover, the natural periods of Hambantota Port are well calculated by XB-SB. In general, XB-SB is a reliable tool for predicting nearshore IG waves. However, it requires further improvement to reproduce the hydrodynamics in a well-sheltered harbor, such as Hambantota Port.

Highlights

  • Infragravity (IG) waves are surface waves with typical periods between 30 and 300 s.More and more coastal processes have been found to be associated with IG waves since they were first observed [1]

  • This study provides a reference and guidance for further applications of XB-SB in coastal IG wave forecasting and harbor hydrodynamic simulations

  • The objective of D1 was to reproduce the hydrodynamics of the sea area where Hambantota

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Infragravity (IG) waves are surface waves with typical periods between 30 and 300 s. Phase-resolving models consider most of the nearshore processes, such as shoaling, refraction, and reflection. Such models are capable of modeling the wave propagation process in a relatively detailed manner. XB-SB does not consider the diffraction and reflection of short waves, it is challenging to use this model in sheltered waters such as harbors. Wong [32] assessed the efficacy of XB-SB for modeling the wave hydrodynamics inside a harbor by comparing its performance with experimental data. The accuracy of XB-SB in modeling IG waves inside a harbor was assessed using an in situ observation dataset. The performance of XB-SB inside the harbor is assessed, including the wave hydrodynamics and the natural periods of the port. The results of this study are discussed and the conclusions are presented

Field Observations
Model Equations
Boundary Conditions
Numerical Setup
Computational domains used ininthe
Model Setup of D1
Model Setup of D2
Data Analysis
Error Metrics
Model Validation
Modeled
Sensitivity to Computational
Performance statistics for D1
For simulation results ofshort
Infragravity Waves near Harbor Entrance
Performance
Infragravity Waves Inside Harbor
It is evident that the short wave heights decreased rapidly as soon
Natural Periods of the Port
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.