Abstract
Eyelid sebaceous carcinoma (SC) remains a common diagnostic pitfall for both the clinician and histopathologist. The aim of this study was to describe perforin as a new marker in the immunohistochemistry panel for SC. A total of 29 cases were retrieved from the Pathology archives, including 11 sebaceous neoplasms (nine SC; two sebaceomas), 10 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and eight basal cell carcinomas (BCC). These were stained using the monoclonal antibody for perforin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), Ber-EP4 and adipophilin (ADP). Sensitivity and specificity of perforin as an immunohistologic marker for sebaceous tumours were compared to EMA, ADP and Ber-EP4. Perforin stained strongly 9/11 (81%) of the sebaceous neoplasms (SN), 7/9 SC and 2/2 of sebaceomas (2/2), similar to ADP. Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) stained 8/9 SC and was negative (1/2) or only very weakly expressed (1/2) in sebaceomas. The specificity of perforin in identifying SN versus SCC and BCC was 100% (95% CI 69-100), while EMA specificity in identifying SN varied according the comparison group (SCC: 50%, 95% CI 18-81, 100% (95% CI 63-100). Perforin better highlighted the intraepithelial spread of SC than EMA. Ber-EP4 was strongly expressed in six of nine SC, but was consistently negative in sebaceomas. The expression pattern of perforin in sebaceous neoplasms enables us to recommend the use of perforin as a new immunohistochemical marker for sebaceous neoplasms.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.