Abstract

Medicine is changing rapidly and diagnostic and therapeutic innovations are common. Not all professionals adopt these innovations in the same way. To survey the physicians' opinions on adopting innovations in cardiovascular health care, to classify individuals from an innovative to a conservative behavior, and to individualize opinion leaders among them, in order to build a social network of influence. Between November and December 2008, 765 Argentine cardiologists were surveyed via e-mail in Argentina, to assess the way they adopt and disseminate innovations in cardiovascular health care. The survey was answered by 537 professionals (70.2%). Fifty three percent of respondents were "Early adopters". However, 63 to 79.3% of respondents preferred to wait for a full demonstration of the usefulness of innovation before adopting it. The opinion leaders' distribution adopted a scale-free network pattern, where few leaders had many connections and influence on the whole network. The giant component of the network included 41% of physicians; growth simulation of the network showed that the four most popular leaders influenced over 44% of the giant component. Among surveyed physicians there was an attitude towards rapid acceptance of innovations in health care. However, when analyzing the direct opinion of physicians, most cases preferred usefulness demonstrated before accepting innovations. The social network including respondents and opinion leaders showed a scale-free topology with a big influence of a few over the whole network.

Highlights

  • Medicine is changing rapidly and diagnostic and therapeutic innovations are common

  • Las redes independientes de escala son muy dependientes de los nodos más conectados y, como en el caso de nuestro estudio, la red puede ser muy influenciada por la opinión de una pequeña cantidad de referentes

  • Se destaca el efecto potencial nocivo que podría tener sobre el sistema de salud, que unos pocos referentes tuviera una influencia decisiva sobre la incorporación de nuevas tecnologías; este mismo riesgo ocurriría en el caso que una alta proporción de los médicos fueran adoptadores tempranos de innovaciones avaladas por una evidencia clínica discutible

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medicine is changing rapidly and diagnostic and therapeutic innovations are common. Not all professionals adopt these innovations in the same way. La red social de influencia que se genera entre los referentes de opinión y los médicos asistenciales es crucial para comprender la dispersión de las nuevas ideas y prácticas.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call