Abstract
Abstract The classic subxiphoid pericardial window technique and the newer, minimally invasive percutaneous fluoroscopy-controlled method of surgical treatment of pericardial effusions and/or tamponade are reviewed and compared based on 12 years of surgical experience. Since 1988, 114 patients underwent surgery for treatment of pericardial effusion and/or tamponade. The classic subxiphoid approach was used on 66 patients, and since 1993, the percutaneous tube pericardiostomy method was employed on 48 patients. In choosing a method for pericardial decompression, disease etiology and patient characteristics must be considered as well as the experience of the surgeon.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
