Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arterial disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and primary stenting are commonly used endovascular therapeutic procedures for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. However, which procedure is more beneficial for patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease is unknown. We performed a meta-analysis, searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Knowledge, and relevant websites without language or publication date restrictions for randomized trials that compared primary stenting with PTA in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. The keywords were "stents," "angioplasty," "infrapopliteal," "tibial arteries," and "below knee." We selected immediate technical success, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and patient survival as the outcomes of this meta-analysis. On the basis of the inclusion criteria, we identified six prospective randomized trials. One-year outcomes did not show any significant differences between the PTA and primary stenting groups, respectively: technical success (93.3% vs 96.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.47; P = .25), primary patency (57.1% vs 65.7%; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35-2.58; P = .92), secondary patency (73.5% vs 57.6%; OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.81-5.34; P = .13), limb salvage (82.2% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.29-1.41; P = .27), and patient survival (84.0% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55; P = .49). For infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease, primary stenting has the same 1-year benefits as PTA. There is insufficient evidence to support the superiority of either method. Primary stenting is associated with a trend toward higher primary patency and lower secondary patency. Further large-scale prospective randomized trials should produce more reliable results.