Abstract
Objective: To determine if the skin incision for lumbar percutaneous pedicle screws should be more lateral in the obese patient.Methods: This was a retrospective radiographic analysis of 30 obese and non-obese lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) radiographs comparing the depth of soft tissue along the anatomic axis of the pedicle at L4 and L5.Results: The average distance from the pedicle trajectory on the skin to the lateral border of the pedicle at L4 was 1.4 cm and 3.8 cm in the non-obese and obese groups, respectively. The average distance from the pedicle trajectory on the skin to the lateral border of the pedicle at L5 was 2.1 cm and 4.3 cm in the non-obese and obese groups, respectively; both these differences reached statistical significance, p <0.05.Conclusions: This radiographic study supports a more lateral start point for percutaneous pedicle screws in obese patients to maintain an anatomic trajectory when inserting percutaneous pedicle screws into the lumbar spine at L4 and L5. If a skin incision is made at only 1 cm lateral to the pedicle in the obese patient, the surgeon often has to place significant traction on the skin edge to lateralize their instrumentation to achieve an appropriate angle of insertion. By making a more lateral skin incision, less manipulation of the skin and soft tissues is needed to maintain an anatomic trajectory of the pedicle screw. Decreasing soft tissue manipulation may decrease wound and instrumentation complications in this at-risk population.
Highlights
Instrumented fusion with lumbar pedicle screw placement has a proven history of forming a rigid construct that results in fusion for a variety of spinal pathologies [1,2,3]
Percutaneous pedicle screws have demonstrated lower complication rates and significantly less morbidity when compared to the standard open approach to the posterior lumbar spine [2]
computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen/pelvis were chosen over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to ensure the cutaneous margin was included in the study
Summary
Instrumented fusion with lumbar pedicle screw placement has a proven history of forming a rigid construct that results in fusion for a variety of spinal pathologies [1,2,3]. This can be performed via a standard open surgical approach, or through percutaneous techniques. Minimally invasive procedures have experienced a dramatic increase in popularity in spine surgery because of the significant morbidity involved in a standard open exposure [4, 5]. Percutaneous pedicle screws have demonstrated lower complication rates and significantly less morbidity when compared to the standard open approach to the posterior lumbar spine [2].
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
