Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Reduction: Procedural and Long-term Clinical Outcomes

Abstract

BackgroundSignificant paravalvular leak (PVL) after prosthetic replacement can result in hemolysis and/or congestive heart failure (CHF). Percutaneous PVL reduction (PPVR) represents an alternative to repeat surgery for a selected population. The purpose of this study was to assess the procedural and long-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous PPVR and its effect on survival free of rehospitalization for CHF, surgical reintervention, and death. MethodsWe analyzed a cohort of 56 consecutive patients who underwent 61 PPVRs in our institution between June 2001 and December 2010. Procedural success was defined as a reduction in regurgitation severity free from procedural complications. Patients were followed-up for vital status, clinical events, and symptoms. ResultsPatients were aged 65 ± 11 years, with an average logistic EuroSCORE of 19 ± 14%. Indications for PPVR included CHF (61%), hemolysis (9%), or both (30%), caused by mitral (n = 44) or aortic (n = 12) PVL. Procedural success was achieved in 75% of cases. Three major complications, including 2 deaths, occurred during the initial 30-day follow-up in the 42 patients who were treated with a device. After adjusting for the logistic EuroSCORE, prosthesis type (mitral vs aortic), and time interval since the last valve surgery, a successful PPVR was associated with a better survival free of rehospitalisation for CHF, need for surgical reintervention, and death compared with patients with a failed PPVR. (hazard ratio = 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.71). ConclusionsPPVR is associated with a reasonable rate of procedural success and favourable cardiovascular outcomes, and represents an appropriate option when technically possible.