Abstract
Percutaneous method has increased in popularity in the traumatic spine field over recent 2 decades. The minimally invasive procedure has several advantages, including the diminished length of hospital stay, bleeding and early postoperative rehabilitation.
Highlights
IntroductionPercutaneous fixation of the thoracolumbar spine was firstly described by Magerl by using the external fixator [1]
At the end of follow up the Oswestry disability index and ASIA score were used in the evaluation of results
Percutaneous fixation of the thoracolumbar spine was firstly described by Magerl by using the external fixator [1]
Summary
Percutaneous fixation of the thoracolumbar spine was firstly described by Magerl by using the external fixator [1]. The longitudinal connectors were placed either superficially, just beneath the skin or externally This has several potential disadvantages 1st, the superficial plate may be irritating and needs removal. In Comparison with old percutaneous techniques, many new systems allow the screw placement in a perfect anatomical position. This achieves the best biomechanical stable fixation and makes the hardware stable without harmful irritating effect to the skin and muscles of the back. According to the AO classification 37 patients (92.5%) were type A3 fracture and 3 patients (7.5%) had type A1 fracture. All patients were neurologically free according to the ASIA score
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
