Abstract

Introduction: Inadequate nutritional support after LVAD placement is known to increase postoperative infections and to decrease survival. LVAD patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation and complicated postoperative recovery requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation may require long-term tube feedings. Placement of a PEG requires knowledge of the location of the LVAD pocket and driveline to avoid device infection and injury. Methods: Between August 2008 and December 2011, 39 patients underwent HeartMate II LVAD placement in our institution. Among them, 5 patients underwent PEG tube placement for long-term nutritional support. Procedure management consisted of cessation of anticoagulation and correction of abnormal coagulation; a cardiothoracic surgeon or intensivist in the operating room to communicate with the surgeon who performed the PEG procedure; and VAD coordinator or perfusionist in the operating room to assist in monitoring the VAD. Data were retrospectively analyzed to investigate complications related to the PEG placement. Results: The studied patients consisted of 3 males and 2 females with mean age of 58 +/﹣5.0. The interval of LVAD to PEG placement was a mean 21 +/﹣8.8 days. PEG was successfully performed in the operating room in all patients. There were no LVAD device or driveline injuries related to the PEG procedure. There were no postoperative short-term or long-term PEG related complications such as acute gastric bleeding or dislodgement of the PEG tube. Conclusions: PEG placement for HeartMate II LVAD patients can be done without increasing the risk of device or intraabdominal organ injury with carefully coordinated efforts from both the mechanical support team and surgical services.

Highlights

  • Inadequate nutritional support after left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) placement is known to increase postoperative infections and to decrease survival

  • Procedure management consisted of cessation of anticoagulation and correction of abnormal coagulation; a cardiothoracic surgeon or intensivist in the operating room to communicate with the surgeon who performed the Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) procedure; and VAD coordinator or perfusionist in the operating room to assist in monitoring the VAD

  • PEG placement for HeartMate II LVAD patients can be done without increasing the risk of device or intraabdominal organ injury with carefully coordinated efforts from both the mechanical support team and surgical services

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inadequate nutritional support after LVAD placement is known to increase postoperative infections and to decrease survival. 5 patients underwent PEG tube placement for long-term nutritional support. Conclusions: PEG placement for HeartMate II LVAD patients can be done without increasing the risk of device or intraabdominal organ injury with carefully coordinated efforts from both the mechanical support team and surgical services. The patients in this study had a complicated postoperative recovery period after receiving HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation, which required long-term nutritional support. Many protocols designed to provide this platform involve the use total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or a nasogastric tubes (NGT) for long-term feedings. Both modalities of TPN and NGT tube feeding carry the risk of multiple complications. Patients receiving the HeartMate II LVAD are already at an increased risk of GIB; so another route of nutritional support was sought [7]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call