Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tumors: Is It Time for a New Paradigm Shift?

Abstract

PurposeTo retrospectively assess long-term outcomes of percutaneous renal cryoablation, including factors affecting complications and local recurrence rates. Materials and MethodsA total of 357 computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy–guided percutaneous cryoablation procedures were performed for 382 masses in 302 outpatients; 347 were biopsy-proven renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) or Bosniak category > III masses (n = 28). Benign pathologic conditions (n = 18) or metastatic non-RCC disease (n = 17) were included to analyze procedural complication rate, but recurrence rates, tumor staging, and nephrometry score were limited to RCCs. The average tumor diameter was 2.9 cm (range, 1–10.3 cm), and median nephrometry score for RCC was 8 (mean, 7.4). Protection of adjacent vital structures was performed in 34% of procedures (n = 121), and ureteral stent placement was performed for 9.2% (n = 33). All major complications were graded per surgical Clavien–Dindo criteria. ResultsThe average CT-visible cryoablation zone diameter was 5 cm (range, 2.5–10.5 cm). Grade ≥ 3 complications occurred in 2.8% of procedures (n = 10), and appeared related to only high nephrometry scores (P = .0086) and larger tumors (P = .0034). No significant changes in renal function before and after the procedure were noted (P = .18). At a mean follow-up of 31.8 months, the local tumor recurrence rate was 3.2% (11 of 347) for RCC, and no significant difference was noted between tumors larger or smaller than 3 cm (P = .15). The difference reached significance only among the small number of stage ≥ T2 RCC tumors (P = .0039). ConclusionsLong-term follow-up of percutaneous renal cryoablation demonstrates low recurrence rates with preserved renal function, even for patients with high nephrometry scores and body mass index, assuming thorough cytotoxic technique and protection measures.