Abstract
Texture is widely used in CBIR, and there have been a number of studies over the years to establish which features are perceptually significant. However it is still difficult to retrieve reliably images that the human user would agree are similar. This paper reviews a range of computational methods, and compares their performance in classifying and retrieving images from the Brodatz set. Their performance is then related to the combined ranking of images from the same dataset, obtained from experiments where human volunteers were asked to identify which images were most like each of the Brodatz images. The full set of 112 images was used. We conclude that no one method consistently returns retrievals which the human user would agree were similar across the full range of textures, but that statistical methods appear to perform better overall. We propose a subset of the Brodatz images for comparison of retrieval methods, based on the correlation between individual rankings.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
