Abstract

Adaptation was studied in a paradigm in which the adapting stimulus was a variably biased version of a bistable apparent motion stimulus, a motion quartet, and the post-adaptation test stimulus was a “neutral” motion quartet. Either horizontal or vertical motion was perceived, never both at the same time. When only one of these was perceived during the entire adaptation phase of a trial, and the perceived motion was highly stable, adaptation effects were greater for the perceived than the unperceived motion directions (i.e., adaptation was selective to the perceived motion). However, when the perceived motion during adaptation was relatively unstable (i.e., when the perceived motion was more likely to spontaneously change directions), similar levels of adaptation were obtained for perceived as well as unperceived, but possible motion directions. Thus, adaptation occurs prior to the determination of which of the competing motion directions will be perceived. The relationship between the stability of the adapting percept and the selectivity of adaptation is explained in terms of differences in the activation of mutually inhibitory horizontal and vertical motion detectors. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.