Perceptual Learning in Speech

Abstract

phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation. In C. Fougeron, B. Kuhnert, M. D’Imperio, & N. Vallee (Eds.), Laboratory phonology (Vol. 10, pp. 91–111). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Greenspan, S. L., Nusbaum, H. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 421–433. Nygaard, L. C., Sommers, M. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5(1), 42–46. Samuel, A. G., & Kraljic, T. (2009). Perceptual learning for speech. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71(6), 1207–1218. Stacey, P. C., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2007). Effectiveness of computer- based auditory training in improving the perception of noisevocoded speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5 Pt1), 2923–2935. 2584 P Perceptual Learning in Speech