Abstract
The visual system's flexibility in estimating depth is remarkable: We readily perceive 3-D structure under diverse conditions from the seemingly random dots of a "magic eye" stereogram to the aesthetically beautiful, but obviously flat, canvasses of the Old Masters. Yet, 3-D perception is often enhanced when different cues specify the same depth. This perceptual process is understood as Bayesian inference that improves sensory estimates. Despite considerable behavioral support for this theory, insights into the cortical circuits involved are limited. Moreover, extant work tested quantitatively similar cues, reducing some of the challenges associated with integrating computationally and qualitatively different signals. Here we address this challenge by measuring fMRI responses to depth structures defined by shading, binocular disparity, and their combination. We quantified information about depth configurations (convex "bumps" vs. concave "dimples") in different visual cortical areas using pattern classification analysis. We found that fMRI responses in dorsal visual area V3B/KO were more discriminable when disparity and shading concurrently signaled depth, in line with the predictions of cue integration. Importantly, by relating fMRI and psychophysical tests of integration, we observed a close association between depth judgments and activity in this area. Finally, using a cross-cue transfer test, we found that fMRI responses evoked by one cue afford classification of responses evoked by the other. This reveals a generalized depth representation in dorsal visual cortex that combines qualitatively different information in line with 3-D perception.
Highlights
Many everyday tasks rely on depth estimates provided by the visual system
We found that fMRI responses in dorsal visual area V3B/KO were more discriminable when disparity and shading concurrently signaled depth, in line with the predictions of cue integration
We provide three lines of evidence that activity in dorsal visual area V3B/KO reflects the integration of disparity and shading depth cues in a perceptually relevant manner
Summary
Many everyday tasks rely on depth estimates provided by the visual system To facilitate these outputs, the brain exploits a range of inputs: from cues related to distance in a mathematically simple way (e.g., binocular disparity, motion parallax) to those requiring complex assumptions and prior knowledge (e.g., shading, occlusion; Burge, Fowlkes, & Banks, 2010; Kersten, Mamassian, & Yuille, 2004; Mamassian & Goutcher, 2001). The brain exploits a range of inputs: from cues related to distance in a mathematically simple way (e.g., binocular disparity, motion parallax) to those requiring complex assumptions and prior knowledge (e.g., shading, occlusion; Burge, Fowlkes, & Banks, 2010; Kersten, Mamassian, & Yuille, 2004; Mamassian & Goutcher, 2001) These diverse signals each evoke an impression of depth in their own right; the brain aggregates cues (Landy, Maloney, Johnston, & Young, 1995; Buelthoff & Mallot, 1988; Dosher, Sperling, & Wurst, 1986) to improve perceptual judgments (Knill & Saunders, 2003). Perceptual judgments show evidence for the combination of disparity and shading
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.